For scanned wills and trusts, I’d choose a NAS that pairs dependable file access with a clear backup plan, not just the largest drive count. The Synology DS425+ is my best overall pick for its four-bay flexibility and established private-cloud approach; the Synology DS925+ suits buyers planning for broader storage needs, while the BUFFALO LinkStation 720 stands out for people who want drives included. The main tradeoffs are expansion room versus simplicity, diskless flexibility versus ready-to-use storage, and convenient remote access versus the extra security work it requires. A NAS can help protect important scans, but it should not be the only copy of them. Read on for the full breakdown and a guide to choosing a setup that fits your documents and backup habits.
Get home office essentials delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Key Takeaways
- Four bays offer the strongest growth path: the DS425+ and DS925+ let buyers add capacity or plan a storage arrangement around more drives, while the two-bay models suit smaller archives.
- Drive-included convenience separates BUFFALO: the LinkStation 720 is the clearest choice for someone who does not want to source disks separately, though its two-bay design gives less room to grow than four-bay options.
- Synology’s range covers different levels of commitment: the DS223 and DS225+ are simpler two-bay entry points, while the DS425+ and DS925+ better fit households expecting larger or expanding collections.
- Diskless models shift responsibility to the buyer: the Synology and UGREEN options let buyers select drives, but require extra research into compatible disks, capacity, and setup.
- RAID is not a substitute for a second backup: drive redundancy can help keep files available after a disk failure, but it does not protect against deletion, theft, fire, or account compromise.
| Synology DS425+ 4-Bay Diskless NAS Private Cloud Media Server |  | Best Overall for Organized Family Archives | Drive bays: 4 | Drive inclusion: Diskless | Maximum speed: 278 MB/s | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| UGREEN NAS DXP4800 GT 4-Bay for Creators, Tech Enthusiasts, and Office Teams |  | Best for Advanced Multi-User Workloads | Processor: AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514, 4 cores, up to 3.70GHz | Memory: 8GB DDR4, expandable to 64GB; included memory is non-ECC | Drive bays: 4 SATA bays | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Synology 4-Bay DiskStation DS925+ (Diskless) |  | Best for a Growing Document Archive | Model: DS925+ | Drive bays: 4 | Drive inclusion: Diskless | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| BUFFALO LinkStation 720 16TB 2-Bay NAS with Hard Drives Included |  | Best Ready-to-Use Storage | Model: LS720D1602 | Included capacity: 16TB | Drive bays: 2 | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Synology DS225+ Private Cloud Media Server – 2-Bay Diskless NAS with Intel CPU |  | Best Compact Synology Option | Storage bays: 2 | Drive inclusion: Diskless | CPU: Intel | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Synology DS223 Home & Office Backup Hub – 2-Bay Diskless NAS |  | Best for Shared Family Document Archives | Drive bays: 2 | Drives included: No; diskless | Warranty: 2 years | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| nas for scanned wills and trust | Drive bays | Warranty | Drive inclusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Synology DS425+ 4-Bay Diskless | 4 | 3 years | Diskless |
| UGREEN NAS DXP4800 GT 4-Bay fo | 4 SATA bays | — | — |
| Synology 4-Bay DiskStation DS9 | 4 | 3 years | Diskless |
| BUFFALO LinkStation 720 16TB 2 | 2 | 2 years | — |
| Synology DS225+ Private Cloud | — | 3 years | Diskless |
| Synology DS223 Home & Office B | 2 | 2 years | — |
More Details on Our Top Picks
Synology DS425+ 4-Bay Diskless NAS Private Cloud Media Server
For scanned wills, trusts, and supporting records, the DS425+ balances capacity, sharing, and backup features without the networking complexity of the UGREEN DXP4800 GT. Four bays give a household room to build a redundant storage pool and expand its document archive, while the listed 278 MB/s transfer speed is more than these scans need; it is more relevant if several people also access media or backups. Support for 10+ users can suit families or a small office with separate accounts, and RAID and backup support add layers of protection against drive failure. It is still a diskless system, so drives must be selected and installed separately. Compared with the two-bay DS225+, it offers more bays, but setup and drive planning make it a less simple choice for someone storing only a small set of documents.
Pros:- Four bays allow a more flexible storage and redundancy plan than two-bay models.
- Supports 10+ users, useful when family members or office staff need individual access.
- RAID and backup support can help protect scans from a single drive failure.
- Listed 278 MB/s speed also accommodates larger shared files and media.
Cons:- Diskless design means drives are a separate purchase and setup task.
- Configuration may feel complex to beginners managing their first NAS.
- Its broader media and surveillance capabilities may be unnecessary for a document-only archive.
Best for: Families or small offices that want a shared, expandable archive with separate access for multiple people and room for other household files.
Not ideal for: People who want a ready-to-use unit or need only a small document archive; it ships without drives and has a more involved setup than a basic two-bay option.
- Drive bays:4
- Drive inclusion:Diskless
- Maximum speed:278 MB/s
- User support:10+ users
- Surveillance support:Up to 30 IP cameras
- Data protection:RAID and backup support
- Warranty:3 years
Our verdict“Choose the DS425+ if you want a four-bay shared archive with room to grow, and skip it if a simpler two-drive setup is enough.”
UGREEN NAS DXP4800 GT 4-Bay for Creators, Tech Enthusiasts, and Office Teams
The DXP4800 GT is the performance-heavy pick here, but its extra capacity and connectivity matter most when scanned legal records are part of a larger office storage workload. Its dual 10GbE ports and stated throughput of up to 2.5GB/s can move large collections quickly across a suitably equipped network; for ordinary PDF scans, that headroom is unlikely to change day-to-day access. The four SATA bays, NVMe support, and expandable memory make it more configurable than the Synology DS425+, while the Ryzen processor and virtualization support are aimed at users running additional services. That flexibility brings more setup work, and the included RAM is non-ECC. Drives are not included either, so this is a poor fit for someone seeking a straightforward document vault rather than a customizable server.
Pros:- Dual 10GbE ports support fast transfers on a compatible network.
- Four SATA bays plus U.2 and M.2 support provide several storage expansion paths.
- Memory can be expanded from 8GB to 64GB for heavier multitasking.
- Security features include TLS/SSL, encryption algorithms, and RAID support.
Cons:- Diskless configuration requires separate drive selection and installation.
- Docker and virtualization features can make setup demanding for nontechnical owners.
- Included RAM is non-ECC, and ECC requires compatible replacement memory.
Best for: Tech-comfortable small-office administrators who store legal scans alongside large project files, run additional services, and have a 10GbE network.
Not ideal for: Families or individuals who only need reliable access to scanned documents; the advanced networking and virtualization features add complexity without much benefit for that use.
- Processor:AMD Ryzen Embedded R2514, 4 cores, up to 3.70GHz
- Memory:8GB DDR4, expandable to 64GB; included memory is non-ECC
- Drive bays:4 SATA bays
- Drive support:Up to 32TB per SATA bay, plus U.2 NVMe and M.2 SSD support
- Maximum listed capacity:Up to 144TB total
- Networking:Dual 10GbE ports with Link Aggregation support
- Maximum throughput:Up to 2.5GB/s with dual 10GbE ports
- Connectivity:USB 3.2, USB-C, HDMI, and SD card slot
- Security and software:TLS/SSL, RSA, AES, SHA-512, RAID, Docker, virtual machines, SAN Manager, and Surveillance Center support
Our verdict“Pick the DXP4800 GT when a document archive is one part of a demanding, fast-networked server setup, not when scanned records are the only job.”
Synology 4-Bay DiskStation DS925+ (Diskless)
The DS925+ fits buyers who expect their scanned-record collection to grow or want one NAS to serve several years of household or office files. Its four bays and expansion support up to nine drives give it a clearer growth path than the two-bay DS225+ and the fixed two-bay BUFFALO LinkStation 720. Dual 2.5GbE ports also offer faster network connections than a basic single-gigabit setup, though scanned wills and trusts rarely need that speed on their own. Synology’s DiskStation Manager supplies sharing, backup, and surveillance tools, which can keep documents alongside other central storage tasks. This model is diskless, and expansion capacity is only useful if you are prepared to buy and manage more drives. Compared with the DS425+, its listed specifications emphasize expansion rather than a stated transfer-speed figure.
Pros:- Expansion support up to nine drives gives the archive room to grow.
- Dual 2.5GbE ports provide more network capacity than a basic connection.
- DiskStation Manager supports file sharing, backups, and surveillance in one system.
- Four bays allow more storage and redundancy choices than two-bay alternatives.
Cons:- No drives are included, so the system needs a separate storage plan.
- Beginners may find setup and ongoing drive management involved.
- For document scans alone, the expansion potential may exceed practical needs.
Best for: Households, practices, or small organizations that plan to grow an archive over time and want the option to expand beyond four drives.
Not ideal for: People who want included storage, minimal setup, or a modest archive that will fit comfortably in a two-bay NAS.
- Model:DS925+
- Drive bays:4
- Drive inclusion:Diskless
- Expansion support:Up to 9 drives
- Network ports:2 x 2.5GbE
- Management software:Synology DiskStation Manager
- Listed functions:Data sharing, backup, and surveillance
- Warranty:3 years
Our verdict“Choose the DS925+ if planned archive growth and expansion matter more than simplicity; otherwise, a two-bay NAS may be easier to manage.”
BUFFALO LinkStation 720 16TB 2-Bay NAS with Hard Drives Included
The LinkStation 720 is the clearest choice for buyers who do not want to source drives separately: it includes 16TB across two bays, unlike the diskless Synology DS225+ and DS425+. For an archive of scanned wills and trusts, its RAID 1 option can mirror the drives, leaving 8TB usable while providing protection against a single drive failure. RAID 0 keeps the full 16TB available but does not provide that same redundancy, so the choice affects how the archive is protected. Secure sharing, SSL encryption, and cloud integrations add useful ways to access or copy files. Compared with the four-bay DS925+, it offers less room to expand and fewer storage-layout options, but it asks less of the buyer at the outset. Network setup is still required, and RAID is not a substitute for an independent backup.
Pros:- Includes hard drives, avoiding separate drive selection before setup.
- RAID 1 offers 8TB usable capacity with mirrored-drive redundancy.
- Secure sharing includes access restrictions and SSL encryption.
- Cloud integration supports Dropbox, Azure, and OneDrive.
Cons:- RAID 1 reduces the listed 16TB capacity to 8TB usable.
- Two bays offer less expansion flexibility than the four-bay Synology models.
- Network setup and configuration are still needed for the intended sharing workflow.
Best for: A household or small office that wants included drives and a simpler path to centralized storage for legal scans and routine backups.
Not ideal for: People who expect substantial storage growth, need more than two bays, or want the broadest flexibility in drive configuration.
- Model:LS720D1602
- Included capacity:16TB
- Drive bays:2
- RAID options:RAID 1 (8TB usable) or RAID 0 (16TB)
- Supported operating systems:Windows and macOS
- Cloud integration:Dropbox, Azure, and OneDrive
- Included accessories:AC adapter, Cat 6A Ethernet cable, and quick setup guide
- Warranty:2 years
Our verdict“Choose the LinkStation 720 for an included-drive, two-bay archive, provided its 8TB RAID 1 capacity meets your needs.”
Synology DS225+ Private Cloud Media Server – 2-Bay Diskless NAS with Intel CPU
The DS225+ makes sense for a smaller scanned-record archive when you want Synology’s private-cloud and backup approach without committing to a four-bay chassis. Its two bays and RAID redundancy can suit wills, trusts, and related PDFs, while the listed 282 MB/s transfer speed leaves room for other home files and media. Compared with the DS425+, it has fewer bays and less room for storage growth, but its simpler capacity target may be easier to plan around. The BUFFALO LinkStation 720 is the alternative if included drives matter; the DS225+ arrives diskless, giving buyers control over drive choice but adding a separate purchase and installation step. Advanced remote access and backup settings may take more work to configure than a basic file-share setup.
Pros:- Two bays provide a compact setup for a focused document and home-file archive.
- RAID redundancy and automated backup support can help protect stored scans.
- Listed 282 MB/s transfer speed supports more than occasional document access.
- Supports 4K streaming and up to 30 IP cameras with AI detection.
Cons:- Diskless setup requires separate drive purchases and installation.
- Two bays provide less expansion room than the DS425+ or DS925+.
- Advanced backup and remote-access configuration may challenge beginners.
Best for: Individuals or small households building a modest private archive who prefer a two-bay Synology system and are comfortable choosing drives separately.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want storage included, expect the archive to grow substantially, or need multi-user capacity beyond a small household.
- Storage bays:2
- Drive inclusion:Diskless
- CPU:Intel
- Transfer speed:282 MB/s
- Data protection:Automated backups and RAID redundancy
- Media support:4K media streaming
- Surveillance support:Up to 30 IP cameras with AI detection
- Warranty:3 years
Our verdict“Choose the DS225+ for a compact Synology archive with room for everyday home files, but choose a four-bay model if growth is likely.”
Synology DS223 Home & Office Backup Hub – 2-Bay Diskless NAS
For scanned wills, trusts, and related records shared across a household, the DS223 offers a focused two-bay home for files from multiple devices. Its automated backups and file version control can help keep an earlier copy available if a document is accidentally changed or deleted. Compared with the Synology DS425+, it has fewer bays, so it suits a smaller archive rather than a growing office library. It also arrives without hard drives, unlike the Buffalo LinkStation 720 bundle, which means you choose and purchase storage separately. That flexibility adds setup work and cost, and beginners may find configuration demanding. I’d choose it for a modest family archive that needs centralized access and backup features, not for buyers seeking a ready-to-use system or room to expand substantially.
Pros:- Centralizes files from multiple devices for shared access to scanned records.
- Supports file collaboration and version control for recovering earlier document copies.
- Automates backups across various devices and platforms.
- Can support IP-camera surveillance alongside file storage.
Cons:- Hard drives must be purchased separately, adding a separate drive-selection and installation step.
- Setup may be challenging for beginners unfamiliar with NAS configuration.
- Two bays offer less room for expansion than four-bay options such as the Synology DS425+.
Best for: Families or small home offices that want to centralize scanned legal documents and automate backups from several devices, and are comfortable choosing and installing drives.
Not ideal for: Beginners who want a simple, ready-to-run archive, or offices expecting substantial capacity growth; it is diskless and has only two bays.
- Drive bays:2
- Drives included:No; diskless
- Warranty:2 years
- Intended use:Home and office
- File features:File sharing, collaboration, and version control
- Backup features:Automated backups for multiple devices and platforms
- Additional use:IP-camera surveillance system
Our verdict“Choose the DS223 for a small shared document archive with automated backups, but pick a four-bay NAS if you expect the collection to grow substantially.”
How We Picked
I ranked these NAS devices around the needs of a private legal-document archive: dependable access, practical backup options, room for growth, setup demands, and the amount of hardware a buyer must source separately. I gave extra weight to models that make sense for keeping scanned documents organized and available without forcing every household into a large, complex system. Bay count and included drives matter because they shape both the initial setup and the next storage decision.
The DS425+ leads for its balance of four-bay flexibility and private-cloud use. The DS925+ follows for buyers who want a more ambitious four-bay setup, while the UGREEN DXP4800 GT is positioned for technically confident users and office teams rather than the simplest household archive. The two-bay Synology models rank lower for expansion, and the BUFFALO LinkStation 720 trades that growth room for included drives and a more direct starting point. Product names and listed configurations guide this comparison; buyers should check current drive compatibility and software features before purchase.
Factors to Consider When Choosing Nas For Scanned Wills And Trusts
Choosing a NAS for legal scans is as much a decision about how you will protect and retrieve files as it is about hardware. I’d settle the document workflow, backup locations, and household access rules before choosing capacity or bay count.
Decide how many copies your documents need
A NAS can centralize scans, but a single box leaves those files exposed to theft, electrical damage, fire, and mistakes. Keep another copy on a separate device or in a reputable encrypted cloud backup, and consider an off-site copy for especially important records. RAID can keep a system running after some drive failures, but it is not a backup of earlier file versions. Test restoring a few files before trusting the process with your full archive. The common mistake is buying extra bays and treating that as protection from every kind of loss.
Choose bays for growth, not as a substitute for backup
Two-bay NAS units can suit a modest archive and a household that wants a compact system; four bays offer more room to expand or configure storage choices. More bays do not automatically mean safer documents, since a single device can still be lost or compromised. Think about how much storage scans, photos, and other household files may occupy over several years, then leave room for growth. If you expect the NAS to serve several users or additional files, a four-bay model may save a replacement sooner. If your archive is small and stable, paying for unused capacity may add complexity without helping your backup routine.
Treat drive selection as part of the purchase
Diskless units give you control over drive capacity and selection, but they also require research and a separate purchase. Confirm that the drives you plan to use are supported by the NAS, and consider NAS-oriented drives designed for continuous operation. Models with drives included simplify the first setup, though they limit how much choice you have over the supplied storage. Compare the full system you need, including drives, rather than judging a diskless NAS by the enclosure alone. Keep in mind that drive capacity and usable space can differ once a redundancy arrangement is configured.
Plan secure access before enabling remote connections
Remote access can make it easier to share a document with an attorney or retrieve a scan away from home, but it adds security responsibilities. Use unique passwords, multi-factor authentication where available, and separate accounts for household members instead of sharing one administrator login. Give each person access only to folders they need, and avoid exposing the NAS directly to the public internet unless you understand the security settings. For occasional sharing, a controlled link or a separate encrypted transfer method may be simpler than broad remote access. Decide who will maintain updates and account access before the device becomes part of your estate-document workflow.
Make file organization and recovery part of the setup
A secure archive is only useful if authorized people can locate the right document when needed. Use consistent filenames that include document type and date, and create separate folders for originals, superseded versions, and supporting records. Keep a printed or separately stored note explaining how an executor or trusted family member can reach the files; do not put passwords in an unprotected folder on the NAS. Check that scans are readable and complete, including signatures and attachments, before treating them as archival copies. Schedule occasional restore checks so you know the backup contains usable files, not just a successful-looking job log.
Match the system to the person who will maintain it
The best NAS is not necessarily the one with the most features; it is the one someone will update, monitor, and restore from. A less technical household may prefer a simpler two-bay system or a model with drives already installed, while a technically confident owner may value the flexibility of a diskless four-bay device. Write down who will replace a failed drive, review backup alerts, and manage access if the primary owner is unavailable. Paying more for expansion makes sense when storage growth is likely or several people depend on the archive. If no one wants ongoing maintenance, pair a basic NAS with a clearly documented off-site backup plan or consider a managed storage service instead.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a NAS enough to protect scanned wills and trusts?
No. A NAS can centralize files and may help keep them available when a drive fails, but the box itself can still be stolen, damaged, or affected by accidental deletion or ransomware. Keep at least one separate backup, ideally with an off-site copy, and check that you can restore files from it. For legal records, preserve paper originals where required and confirm with your attorney which electronic copies are suitable for your needs. Think of the NAS as one part of a records plan, not the entire plan.
Should I choose a two-bay or four-bay NAS for a family document archive?
Start with the amount of storage you expect to use and how much growth you anticipate, rather than choosing solely by bay count. A two-bay model may be enough for scanned documents and a modest set of household files, while four bays give more flexibility as the archive grows. Neither layout replaces a separate backup, so do not pay for extra bays as a stand-in for off-site protection. If several family members will add files or the NAS will also hold photos and computer backups, the added room of a four-bay system may be useful. Leave space for growth instead of planning to fill every drive immediately.
Are the drives-included BUFFALO LinkStation 720 or a diskless Synology easier to start with?
The LinkStation 720 removes the separate drive-selection step because it includes hard drives, which may make the initial purchase simpler. A diskless Synology gives you more control over drive selection but asks you to check compatibility, buy drives separately, and install them. Both paths still call for a plan for redundancy and an independent backup. Compare the whole setup, including drive capacity and backup destination, instead of judging convenience by the enclosure alone. If you prefer to choose every component, a diskless model may suit you; if you want fewer parts to source, the included-drive option has an advantage.
Can I safely let my attorney or executor access documents remotely?
Remote access can be useful, but I would limit it to the specific person and folders needed rather than sharing an administrator account. Use a separate user account, a strong unique password, and multi-factor authentication if the system supports it. Keep the NAS software current and review access when a matter is resolved or a person’s role changes. For a one-time transfer, a secure, time-limited sharing method may be preferable to ongoing access. Keep a written recovery plan somewhere separate so authorized people are not locked out if the primary account holder is unavailable.
What happens to my scans if the NAS owner dies or becomes unable to manage it?
Access can be lost if the only person who knows the administrator credentials is unavailable, so include digital access in the household’s continuity plan. Store recovery instructions and account details securely outside the NAS, and tell an appropriate trusted person where to find them without placing passwords in an ordinary document folder. Set up individual user accounts so access does not depend on one shared login. Confirm that the backup can be restored and that the designated person understands the basic steps. Ask an attorney how digital records and account instructions should fit with your estate documents.
Conclusion
For most households, I recommend the Synology DS425+ as the best overall choice: its four bays provide a useful growth path without making the roundup’s most ambitious system the default. The BUFFALO LinkStation 720 is my best value for buyers who want hard drives included and a more direct starting point, while the Synology DS925+ is the best premium fit for people planning a larger, more involved archive. For beginners who want a compact Synology setup, I’d look at the DS223; the DS225+ is another two-bay option for buyers who want a newer private-cloud media-server format. The UGREEN DXP4800 GT makes more sense for tech enthusiasts, creators, or office teams than for someone seeking the simplest household document store. Whichever model you choose, pair it with a separate backup and a written access plan for the people who may need these records.
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
